Usability engineering for medical devices · Self-paced

Design User Interfaces that minimize Use Errors and make customers happy.

Define Use Specifications, build sound URRAs, and develop robust UI Evaluation Plans that align with IEC 62366-1 and 2026 FDA guidance, practiced on a sample device.

Training a team or paying by purchase order? Email us

9 chapters · about 16–20 hours · IEC 62366-1 and 2026 FDA HF guidance

Top Medical Device Consulting 2026 award badge from MedTech Business ReviewTop Medical Device Consulting 2026 MEDTECH Business ReviewHands-on with a sample device SmartPANC, with DQS answers
One URRA line, SmartPANC bolus entryIllustrative example
Typical entry
Use Error
User error
Cause
Did not follow the IFU
Control
Training and a warning in the IFU
Critical?
Not assessedTested in Summative?
After this course
Use Error
Confirms 5.0 U bolus when 0.5 U was intended
PCA cause
Perception: decimal point hard to see
Control
Leading zero, larger decimal, dose confirmation step
Critical?
Critical TaskDesign control firstHF Validation passed
SmartPANC exercises walk you through every step.
Sound familiar?

The usability file exists. It just isn't finding anything.

  • Human Factors work starts after design freeze, so every finding is expensive to fix.
  • The URRA lists "user error" as the cause and "training" as the control.
  • Nobody is sure which tasks are critical, so Summative testing covers everything, or the wrong things.
  • FDA asks for your Human Factors submission category, and the file can't answer it.

That isn't a lack of effort. It's the lack of a process that connects users, Use Errors, design and validation. This course teaches that process.

Check your usability file

How does your usability work hold up?

Answer for the most recent device your team took through Human Factors work. Your answers stay on this page and aren't sent anywhere.

  1. Did your Human Factors work start before design freeze?
  2. Is each Use Error in your URRA traced to a perception, cognition or action cause, not "user error"?
  3. Can you name your Critical Tasks, and does Summative testing focus on them?
  4. Do your risk controls start with labeling and end with training?
  5. Do you know which FDA Human Factors submission category your device falls in?
Course reviewer, on the DQS Process FMEA course
"Great material. Best I've ever seen in the industry."
Mike Z.Senior Management Consultant
What changes

After the course, your team will be able to

Use Specification · URRA · PCA

Find the real root cause of a Use Error

Build User Profiles and a Use-Related Risk Analysis, then use the Perception-Cognition-Action model to see why an error happens, not just that it can.

Critical Tasks · ANSI/AAMI HE75

Design the error out first

Identify Critical Tasks and apply HE75 principles for controls, displays, alarms and labeling, so training is the last line of defense, not the first.

Formative · Summative · acceptance criteria

Run testing that holds up

Plan Formative Evaluations that improve the interface, and HF Validation with the right participants, training and acceptance criteria.

2026 FDA framework · UE file · EU MDR

Answer the reviewer before they ask

Determine your FDA Human Factors submission category and write a Usability Engineering File that is clear, verifiable and complete.

Is this right for you?

Built for the people who design, test and defend the User Interface

See who it's for, and who it isn't

This course is for you if

  • You are a design or R&D engineer whose device has a User Interface, labeling or instructions.
  • You own or contribute to Human Factors work and want one coherent IEC 62366-1 and FDA process.
  • You work in quality or regulatory and review the Usability Engineering File before submission.
  • You are preparing a submission under FDA's 2026 Human Factors guidance and need to pick the right category.
  • You lead a team and want usability built into development, not bolted on at the end.

It is probably not for you if

  • You want a one-hour overview of usability vocabulary.
  • You are looking for a test report template without changing how your team designs.
How the course is built

Four stages, from intended users to a finished usability file

Every stage ends with hands-on work on the SmartPANC sample device, plus quizzes to confirm you have it before moving on.

Stage 1

Foundations and users

Why usability engineering matters, the standards and FDA framework, and a Use Specification built on real user characteristics.

Chapters 1–2
Stage 2

Risk and design

Use-Related Risk Analysis, Critical Tasks, root causes with PCA, and HE75 design principles that remove errors at the source.

Chapters 3–4
Stage 3

Evaluate and validate

Formative Evaluations that shape the design, then HF Validation testing with the right protocol, participants and data.

Chapters 5–6
Stage 4

Document and sustain

The Usability Engineering File, post-market and change management, FDA submission categories and clear technical writing.

Chapters 7–9
  • 16–20 hrs of learning in 150 lessons
  • 15 quizzes plus a final exam
  • Hands-on exercises on SmartPANC, each with DQS answers
  • Downloadable course materials

Not sure yet? Start Chapter 1 free. You get access inside the course as a student, including the first SmartPANC exercise and quiz, before you decide.

Chapters marked "Your gap" match the answers you gave in the usability check.

  1. Introduction and FoundationsYour gap
  2. Use SpecificationYour gap
  3. Use-Related Risk Analysis (URRA)Your gap
  4. ANSI/AAMI HE75 Design PrinciplesYour gap
  5. Formative EvaluationYour gap
  6. Human Factors Validation TestingYour gap
  7. Documentation and the UE FileYour gap
  8. Post-Market and Lifecycle ManagementYour gap
  9. Regulatory Expectations and Technical WritingYour gap
For managers and team leads

Usability is a team sport. Train the team on one process.

When design, quality and regulatory share the same method, Use Errors get caught earlier, testing is scoped correctly, and the submission tells one consistent story.

  • A shared vocabularyOne way to write Use Errors, Critical Tasks and risk controls across every product line.
  • Pairs with the rest of the librarySafety Risk Management, Design Validation and DFMEA courses build on the same foundation.
  • Impact your business positivelyInvestment in professional development is not a 'nice-to-have'. It has real, tangible benefits.Get the white paper
Dr. John Salvato, founder of Design Quality Services
Your instructor

Dr. John Salvato

Founder and President, Design Quality Services

John has spent more than 30 years in medical device and automotive quality and regulatory work. Since founding DQS in 2017 he has built usability engineering, design control and risk management methods for device makers around the world, and defended that work with agencies and regulatory bodies.

ISO 13485 Lead AuditorISO 14971FDA Design ControlsIEC 62304

"What we offer is capability-focused training. We understand the regulation, but we are also going to teach you how to implement it smartly."

Before you enroll

Questions people ask

Can I try it before I buy?
Yes. Start Chapter 1 free. You get access inside the course as a student and work through the full chapter, including the first SmartPANC exercise and quiz, before you decide.
How much time does it take?
Plan on about 16 to 20 hours. The course is self-paced across 9 chapters and 150 lessons, and most of that time goes into reading and the hands-on SmartPANC exercises rather than video. You have 60 days of access, plus a live discussion with a DQS expert to make sure the concepts are clear.
Does it cover FDA's 2026 Human Factors guidance?
Yes. The course applies IEC 62366-1 and the two 2026 FDA Human Factors guidances as one process, and Chapter 9 walks through the Human Factors submission categories and decision flowchart, with a worked example. EU MDR/IVDR usability requirements are covered too.
I'm not a Human Factors specialist. Will I keep up?
Yes. The course starts with the foundations and key definitions, and every step is practiced on the same sample device, with DQS answers to check your work.
How does usability engineering relate to ISO 14971?
The Use-Related Risk Analysis is where the two meet. The course shows how Use Errors, Critical Tasks and risk controls feed your ISO 14971 risk management file. For full ISO 14971 coverage, see the DQS Safety Risk Management course.

Catch the next Use Error in design, not in the field.

Learn a usability process your team can defend in every design review, audit and submission.

$1,500 · self-paced · start today

Training a team or paying by purchase order? Email us